Starving a Dog in the Name of “Art”

Guillermo Habacuc Vargas, a native Costa Rican, considers himself to be an artist. His latest work, if you can even call it that, featured the chaining and withholding of food from a stray dog picked up from the streets of Nicaragua. Visitors to the exhibition were told not to feed the dog, while the canine, named Nativity, was left to die on the cold, hard floor about 1 foot from a wall display constructed of dog food. Mr. Vargas claims he did the display to highlight the plight that street dogs face in his hometown of San Jose, asserting that it is ok because, “the dog would have died anyway”.

Maybe another artist would like to feature you, Mr. Vargas, in their next display. Being a mortal soul you will eventually perish, so why not be featured in an artistic expression that shows the decline in function as a result of withholding liquids? That way we can better understand the plight of people who do not have access to potable water. The gallery setup could feature a water cooler, kitchen sink, beautiful ice sculpture and ironically arranged spring water containers all within about a foot of your reach. All of the gallery visitors will be encouraged to, instead of giving you liquids, look down upon you sadly and express their concern for your imminent death.

Unfortunately, there are no laws in Nicaragua, where the incident took place almost a year ago, prohibiting animal abuse. While Guillermo Habacuc Vargas may not be able to be prosecuted for his crime, that does not make him any less of a monster. Using “artistic expression” as an excuse to mistreat, harm and eventually kill this dog is pathetic, weak and absolutely shameful.

Somehow, through his use of an unwilling subject’s death, he was awarded for his “vision” and asked to recreate this exhibit at the upcoming Visual Arts Biennial of the Central American showcase in Honduras. We need to make sure this vicious act is not again repeated and no other dog is captured, and subsequently left to die for the sake of “art”. There is a petition that was started and I urge all of you to sign. It is in Spanish and English, but you will need to know these translations to fill it out - you will be asked for your name, email address, Ciudad / Localidad: (required) = city and País: (required) = country.

Petition - http://www.petitiononline.com/13031953/petition-sign.html

Photos from the Exhibit (WARNING - Very Disturbing) - http://elperritovive.blogspot.com/

Share This

April 24th, 2008 | News, Realpolitik, Adventures with Dogs

6 comments

It is not art at all. It is merely a masculist exercise in power and self-absorption without the slightest excuse for ever leaving the slimy dinner napkin on which the first doodles of the project were laid out.

It’s a publicity stunt which isn’t worth a bucket of rabid hippo drool.

This fake art isn’t protected freedom of anything except the freedom to exploit a creature over whom the fake-ass artiste had the power of life and death. It is an exercise in desensitizing people to outrageously stupid, crass behavior.

SHAME ON YOU for not using the brains Nature gave you that would, in the absence of overrides by a numbed incivility, have stopped the plan in its tracks before its capacity to arouse the anger, compassion and disgust reached its masturbatory apex.

The chain measures the distance VIEWERS were willing to go to avoid responsibility for their moral lapse in not jumping over it to rescue respect for life. Starvation represents the power of cruelty to spin a web of BULLSHIT around itself. It is unutterably stupid to suggest that there’s any relationship between national borders and this exercise in worshipping publicity.

Comment by Mars Bar — May 15, 2008 @ 8:51 pm

As disgusting and outrageous as this is, it is art, and it is in no way the place of Americans to suppress it.
Art is supposed to arouse feelings with a message. This has obviously aroused feelings of many people, my self included. It arouses feelings of anger, compassion, and disgust.
This “art” is full of messages. There is a message that the art itself conveys, then there is a message in the reaction to the art.
The chain and the dog are symbolic. The dog is obviously symbolic of a living thing that is starving. Starvation represents a condition that many living things suffer from around the world.
The chain represents a barrier to something better. For the dog this is a barrier that prevents the animal from eating and from escaping its abuse and eventual death. The chain is to the dog, what national borders are for people. Around the world, people are starving and/or being abused in ways that are considered by many, human rights violations. These same countries do not allow their starving abused people to leave the country in pursuit of something better. Even if they could leave, many countries don’t allow these same people to enter their country.
There is a message in the response to the art as well. I have mentioned the starvation of humans around the world that goes unnoticed. If there is a petition signing to stop the starvation of a dog, then it means that the life of one dog is more important than the lives of millions of humans around the world. It means that people in the United States are making a move to repress freedom of speech/artistic expression. The United States, in its war against terrorism and military insurgency in Iraq as well as its constitution, touts democracy and the individual rights and freedoms that accompany it.
There is a reason we protect speech and artistic expression. It is because we don’t want to suppress messages that warn and uncover human & animal rights violations. This “art” expresses that something should be done to protect human and animal rights around the world. People signing petitions to prevent this expression are defeating their own purpose. If the death of this dog in the name of artistic expression ends up getting people active to fight back against human and animal rights violations, then it will prevent the wrongful death, starvation, and abuse of animals and humans around the world. Therefore, it is a masterpiece, much like Picasso’s “Guernica” which aroused similar outrage, but warned of human rights violations. Let’s protect the right to artistic expression. Don’t suppress the message.

Comment by Paul — May 4, 2008 @ 12:45 pm

That is horrible. Not only is he a pathetic excuse, but I can’t believe that all the people that were witness to this were willing to pass by and do nothing!!

Comment by Big Sis — April 25, 2008 @ 10:57 am

I can’t stop crying. Really, this is so ghastly, it’s … unspeakable. This is a crime of the worst sort and everybody who WATCHED IT HAPPEN is guilty too.

Shame on them all.

Comment by Mars Bar — April 25, 2008 @ 10:55 am

Really, I can hardly believe this horrible thing. Are you sure it’s true and not a scam publicity stunt?

If it’s true, the man should not be allowed to get a visa to the USA, where “artists” universally turn a buck. He’s a criminal.

Comment by Mars Bar — April 25, 2008 @ 10:46 am

This is the grossest thing ever. Desensitizing people to this type of CRAP is an abomination. He isn’t an artist. He’s less human than the poor beast he killed.

Comment by Mars Bar — April 25, 2008 @ 10:43 am

Recent Comments:

  • Jess: Border Collies!!! That’s the kind of dog I have (lives at my...
  • chadyo: I had a dream last night that Mr. T was singing karaoke. I think...
  • Slipstream: Love the video. Love Mr. T. Mr. T basically brought me up....
  • Leah: OMG it’s not a chiwawa its a chinese crescent! My Friend...
  • holly: 20…. hrm… i dont know if im happy with that cuz when...
  • Emily Bourne: Your post is now up on the Carnival of Embarrassing...
  • Aunt Pearl: Amy’s blog should be called “Dip in a...

Most Commented

Categories